Design and Make: Translations between the Imagined, the Perceived and the Executed

Main Article Content

Abstract

According to Schön (1987), design is a form of artistry and making, where learning about a specific topic or design emerges through actions (conscious and unconscious) and heuristics. The designer learns how to design by knowing and ‘reflecting in action’, reinterpreting and re-elaborating actions in the particular moment where the act of design takes place (Schön, 1987). This allows the emergence of not only new meanings and coherences, but also reason and knowledge about the creative act. This article presents the optimistic perspective of early CAD proponents in the early 60s that, supported by cybernetic and Artificial Intelligence theories, had as main goal the development of ‘creative enhancers’. This vision is contrasted to the contemporary digital design scenario, discussing the relevance, pertinence and current use of the digital towards the material. Finally, it reveals key aspects of the myriad translations between the imagined, the perceived and the executed, identifying problems and new alternatives for the creative use of what today is ubiquitous and generic in terms of skills available for architects.

Article Details



Diego Pinochet
Pinochet, D. (2016). Design and Make: Translations between the Imagined, the Perceived and the Executed. Materia Arquitectura, (13), 101–104. https://doi.org/10.56255/ma.v0i13.54

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ANDREWS, N. (2010, Spring/Summer). Climate of oppression. Log (19), 137-151.

BAZJANAC, V. (1975). The Promises and the Disappointments of Computer-Aided Design. In N. Negroponte (Ed.), Reflections on Computer Aids to Design and Architecture (pp. 17-26). New York, NY, USA: Petrocelli/Charter.

COONS, S. (1975). Reflections beyond SKETCHPAD. In N. Negroponte (Ed.), Reflections on Computer Aids to Design and Architecture (pp. 27-29). New York, NY, USA: Petrocelli/Charter.

KOLAREVIC, B. (2003). Introduction. In B. Kolarevic (Ed.), Architecture in the digital age: Design and manufacturing (pp. 1-16). New York, NY, USA: Spon Press.

MILNE, M. (1975). Whatever Became Of Design Methodology? In N. Negroponte (Ed.), Reflections on Computer Aids to Design and Architecture (pp. 30-36). New York, NY, USA: Petrocelli/Charter.

NEGROPONTE, N. (1975). Introduction. In N. Negroponte (Ed.), Reflections on Computer Aids to Design and Architecture (pp. 1-13). New York, NY, USA: Petrocelli/Charter.

OXMAN, R. (2006). Theory and design in the first digital age. Design Studies, 27(3), 229-265.

ROBINSON, D. (2013). Feeling extended: Sociality as extended body-becoming-mind. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.

SCHÖN, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco, CA, USA: Jossey-Bass.

SUTHERLAND, I. (1975). Structure in drawings and the hidden surface problem. In N. Negroponte (Ed.), Reflections on Computer Aids to Design and Architecture (pp. 73-77). New York, NY-USA: Petrocelli/Charter.

VISSER, W. (2006). The cognitive artifacts of designing. Mahwah, NJ, USA: L. Erlbaum Associates.