The Anexact: Delimitating Operations in the work of Sejima and Nishizawa
Barra lateral del artículo
Publicado:
ago 10, 2014
Palabras clave:
Line
geometry
anexact
territory
boundary
Sección
Dossier translations
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
The notion of the “anexact” is introduced as a conceptual framework for the study of the generative systems operating in a set of
recurring formal families in the work of Kazuyo Sejima and Ryue Nishizawa. Those formal families are, on the one hand, oriented towards the demarcation of a physical territory and, on the other hand, articulated as continuous, closed lines that describe boundaries whose shapes are not defined by means of abstract, idealised geometries (i.e. circles, arcs or squares). In order to methodologically approach the analysis of the development, intentions and outcomes of the geometric operations deployed by Sejima and Nishizawa as part of their design process, the theoretical works of Paul Klee and Wassily Kandinsky concerning the nature of line and its spatial value are used as a supporting scaffold. Finally, their geometric operations are assimilated to Deleuze and Guattari’s notion of “territory” as a modality of spatial demarcation that is simultaneously anexact and rigorous.
recurring formal families in the work of Kazuyo Sejima and Ryue Nishizawa. Those formal families are, on the one hand, oriented towards the demarcation of a physical territory and, on the other hand, articulated as continuous, closed lines that describe boundaries whose shapes are not defined by means of abstract, idealised geometries (i.e. circles, arcs or squares). In order to methodologically approach the analysis of the development, intentions and outcomes of the geometric operations deployed by Sejima and Nishizawa as part of their design process, the theoretical works of Paul Klee and Wassily Kandinsky concerning the nature of line and its spatial value are used as a supporting scaffold. Finally, their geometric operations are assimilated to Deleuze and Guattari’s notion of “territory” as a modality of spatial demarcation that is simultaneously anexact and rigorous.
Detalles del artículo
Miguel Paredes Maldonado
University of Edinburgh, School of Architecture and Landscape Architecture
Descargas
Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.
Citas
DELEUZE, G., & GUATTARI, F. (1988). Mil mesetas. Capitalismo y esquizofrenia. Valencia: Pre-Textos.
DERRIDA, J. (1978). Introduction to the Origin of Geometry. Stony Brook, NY: Nicolas Hays.
KANDINSKY, W. (1979). Point and Line to Plane. Nueva York: Dover.
KLEE, P. (1948). On Modern Art. Londres: Faber and Faber.
LYNN, G. (1993). Multiplicitous and in-organic bodies. Architectural Design, 63(11/12), 30–37.
UMEMOTO, N., & REISER, J. (2006). Atlas of Novel Tectonics. Nueva York: Princeton Architectural Press.
DERRIDA, J. (1978). Introduction to the Origin of Geometry. Stony Brook, NY: Nicolas Hays.
KANDINSKY, W. (1979). Point and Line to Plane. Nueva York: Dover.
KLEE, P. (1948). On Modern Art. Londres: Faber and Faber.
LYNN, G. (1993). Multiplicitous and in-organic bodies. Architectural Design, 63(11/12), 30–37.
UMEMOTO, N., & REISER, J. (2006). Atlas of Novel Tectonics. Nueva York: Princeton Architectural Press.
Artículos más leídos del mismo autor/a
- Miguel Paredes Maldonado, Lo anexacto: Operaciones delimitadoras en la obra de Sejima y Nishizawa , Materia Arquitectura: Núm. 09 (2014): Materia Arquitectura 09 (Agosto/August 2014)