ACERCA DE LA ARQUITECTURA “NORMATIVA”. NOTAS ACERCA DEL DOMINIO DEL MODO TÉCNICO-RACIONAL DE PENSAMIENTO EN LA PRODUCCIÓN ARQUITECTÓNICA CONVENCIONAL: UNA REVISIÓN HISTÓRICA
Barra lateral del artículo
Publicado:
abr 29, 2021
Palabras clave:
Arquitectura normativa
arquitectura convencional
racionalidad técnica
Durand
Leslie Martin
Sección
Dossier
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
El concepto de practica “convencional” o “normativa” se utiliza frecuentemente para describir el modelo de practica de la arquitectura que suele ser generica en sus ambiciones arquitectonicas y tiende a ajustarse a las reglas economicas del mercado. Este modelo de practica sigue lo que podri llamarse una “ideologi tecnico-racional” que tiende a priorizar los discursos de eficiencia, verificacion y entrega rentable y opor- tuna. Este articulo resaltara algunos de los momentos en la historia de la produccion arquitectonica que han pavimentado la vi para el predominio de la ideologi tecnico-racional en la produccion arquitectonica contemporanea, incorporando las ideas de Jean-Nicolas-Louis Durand y Leslie Martin, asi como las que caracterizaron a la corriente de los Design Methods, todas las cuales influyeron en dar forma a la practica arquitectonica convencional. El articulo concluye con especulaciones acerca de la trayectoria futura de la profesion arquitectonica a la luz de la actual prevalencia de esta ideologi.
Detalles del artículo
Megahed, Y. (2021). ACERCA DE LA ARQUITECTURA “NORMATIVA”. NOTAS ACERCA DEL DOMINIO DEL MODO TÉCNICO-RACIONAL DE PENSAMIENTO EN LA PRODUCCIÓN ARQUITECTÓNICA CONVENCIONAL: UNA REVISIÓN HISTÓRICA. Materia Arquitectura, (19), 34–43. https://doi.org/10.56255/ma.v0i19.428
Descargas
Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.
Citas
BROADBENT, G., & WARD, A. (Eds.). (1969). Design Methods in Architecture (No. 6). Lund Humphries.
BROSHAR, M., STRONG, N., & FRIEDMAN, D. S. (2010). Report on Integrated Practice [Reporte]. American Institute of Architects.
COLE-COLANDER, C. (2003). Designing the Customer Experience. Building Research & Information, 31(5), 357–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/0961321032000088025
CRINSON, M., & LUBBOCK, J. (1994). Architecture: Art or Profession? Three Hundred Years of Architectural Education in Britain. Manchester University Press.
CUFF, D. (1992). Architecture: The Story of Practice. MIT Press.
Yasser Megahed
DURAND, J. N. L. (1813). Nouveau précis des leçons d’architecture données à l’École imperiale polytechnique. Recuperado de http://archive.org/details/ gri_000133125012233678
FRAMPTON, K. (2007). Modern Architecture: A Critical History. Thames & Hudson.
GUTMAN, R. (1988). Architectural Practice: A Critical View. Princeton Architectural Press.
HILL, S., BRINKLEY, I., JOHAR, I., & FOXELL, S. (2010). Risk, Entrepreneurialism, Practice and the Professional Institute [Building Futures Report]. RIBA.
HACKING, I. (1983). Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science. Cambridge University Press.
HUGHES, F. (2014). The Architecture of Error: Matter, Measure, and the Misadventures of Precision. MIT Press.
JENCKS, C. (1987). Le Corbusier and the Tragic View of Architecture. Penguin.
KIERAN, S., & TIMBERLAKE, J. (2003). Refabricating Architecture: How Manufacturing Methodologies are Poised to Transform Building Construction. McGraw-Hill Education.
KOOLHAAS, R., & FOSTER, H. (2013). Junkspace with Running Room. Notting Hill.
LAWSON, B. (2014). How Designers Think: The Design Process Demystified. Routledge.
MARTIN, J. L. (1983). Buildings and Ideas: 1933–1983. Cambridge University Press.
MCELROY, M. (1984). Marketing: How Big Corporations Choose Design Firms. Architectural Record, 172(7), 45 -47.
MCVICAR, M. (2012). God is in the Details’ / ‘The Detail is Moot’: A Meeting Between Mies and Koolhaas. En A. Sharr (Ed.), Reading Architecture and Culture: Researching Buildings, Spaces and Documents (pp. 165-178). Routledge.
MEGAHED, Y., & SHARR, A. (2018). Practiceopolis: From an Imaginary City to a Graphic Novel. Journal of Architectural Education, 72(1), 146–166. https://doi. org/10.1080/10464883.2018.1410670
MURPHY, D. (2016). Last Futures: Nature, Technology and the End of Architecture. Verso.
OMA, KOOLHAAS, R., & MAU, B. (2003). S, M, L, XL (J. Sigler, Ed.). The Monacelli Press.
PÉREZ GÓMEZ, A. (1983). Architecture and the Crises of Modern Science. MIT Press.
PRASAD, S. (2004). Inclusive Maps. En S. Macmillan (Ed.), Designing Better Building: Quality and Value in the Built Environment (pp. 175–184). Taylor & Francis.
ROBINSON, D., JAMIESON, C., WORTHINGTON, J., & COLE, C. (2010). The Future for Architects? [Building Futures Report]. RIBA.
SCHÖN, D. A. (1987). Educating the Reflective Practitioner: Toward a New Design for Teaching and Learning in the Professions. Jossey-Bass.
SCHÖN, D. A. (2017). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Routledge.
SHARR, A. (2010). Leslie Martin and the Science of Architectural Form. En A. Dutoit, J. Odgers, & A. Sharr (Eds.), Quality out of Control: Standards for Measuring Architecture (pp. 67-78). Routledge.
VESELY, D. (2004). Architecture in the Age of Divided Representation: The Question of Creativity in the Shadow of Production. MIT Press.
VILLARI, S. (1990). J.N.L. Durand (1760-1834): Art and Science of Architecture. Rizzoli. WOUDHUYSEN, J., & ABLEY, I. (2004). Why is Construction so Backward? Wiley-Academy.
BROSHAR, M., STRONG, N., & FRIEDMAN, D. S. (2010). Report on Integrated Practice [Reporte]. American Institute of Architects.
COLE-COLANDER, C. (2003). Designing the Customer Experience. Building Research & Information, 31(5), 357–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/0961321032000088025
CRINSON, M., & LUBBOCK, J. (1994). Architecture: Art or Profession? Three Hundred Years of Architectural Education in Britain. Manchester University Press.
CUFF, D. (1992). Architecture: The Story of Practice. MIT Press.
Yasser Megahed
DURAND, J. N. L. (1813). Nouveau précis des leçons d’architecture données à l’École imperiale polytechnique. Recuperado de http://archive.org/details/ gri_000133125012233678
FRAMPTON, K. (2007). Modern Architecture: A Critical History. Thames & Hudson.
GUTMAN, R. (1988). Architectural Practice: A Critical View. Princeton Architectural Press.
HILL, S., BRINKLEY, I., JOHAR, I., & FOXELL, S. (2010). Risk, Entrepreneurialism, Practice and the Professional Institute [Building Futures Report]. RIBA.
HACKING, I. (1983). Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science. Cambridge University Press.
HUGHES, F. (2014). The Architecture of Error: Matter, Measure, and the Misadventures of Precision. MIT Press.
JENCKS, C. (1987). Le Corbusier and the Tragic View of Architecture. Penguin.
KIERAN, S., & TIMBERLAKE, J. (2003). Refabricating Architecture: How Manufacturing Methodologies are Poised to Transform Building Construction. McGraw-Hill Education.
KOOLHAAS, R., & FOSTER, H. (2013). Junkspace with Running Room. Notting Hill.
LAWSON, B. (2014). How Designers Think: The Design Process Demystified. Routledge.
MARTIN, J. L. (1983). Buildings and Ideas: 1933–1983. Cambridge University Press.
MCELROY, M. (1984). Marketing: How Big Corporations Choose Design Firms. Architectural Record, 172(7), 45 -47.
MCVICAR, M. (2012). God is in the Details’ / ‘The Detail is Moot’: A Meeting Between Mies and Koolhaas. En A. Sharr (Ed.), Reading Architecture and Culture: Researching Buildings, Spaces and Documents (pp. 165-178). Routledge.
MEGAHED, Y., & SHARR, A. (2018). Practiceopolis: From an Imaginary City to a Graphic Novel. Journal of Architectural Education, 72(1), 146–166. https://doi. org/10.1080/10464883.2018.1410670
MURPHY, D. (2016). Last Futures: Nature, Technology and the End of Architecture. Verso.
OMA, KOOLHAAS, R., & MAU, B. (2003). S, M, L, XL (J. Sigler, Ed.). The Monacelli Press.
PÉREZ GÓMEZ, A. (1983). Architecture and the Crises of Modern Science. MIT Press.
PRASAD, S. (2004). Inclusive Maps. En S. Macmillan (Ed.), Designing Better Building: Quality and Value in the Built Environment (pp. 175–184). Taylor & Francis.
ROBINSON, D., JAMIESON, C., WORTHINGTON, J., & COLE, C. (2010). The Future for Architects? [Building Futures Report]. RIBA.
SCHÖN, D. A. (1987). Educating the Reflective Practitioner: Toward a New Design for Teaching and Learning in the Professions. Jossey-Bass.
SCHÖN, D. A. (2017). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Routledge.
SHARR, A. (2010). Leslie Martin and the Science of Architectural Form. En A. Dutoit, J. Odgers, & A. Sharr (Eds.), Quality out of Control: Standards for Measuring Architecture (pp. 67-78). Routledge.
VESELY, D. (2004). Architecture in the Age of Divided Representation: The Question of Creativity in the Shadow of Production. MIT Press.
VILLARI, S. (1990). J.N.L. Durand (1760-1834): Art and Science of Architecture. Rizzoli. WOUDHUYSEN, J., & ABLEY, I. (2004). Why is Construction so Backward? Wiley-Academy.
Artículos más leídos del mismo autor/a
- Yasser Megahed, On ‘Normative’ Architecture. Notes on the Domination of the Technical-rational Mode of Thinking on Mainstream Architectural Production: A Historical Highlight , Materia Arquitectura: Núm. 19 (2020): Materia Arquitectura 19 (Agosto/August 2020)