Project Vicissitudes. Private ironism and critique of ideologies
Article Sidebar
Keywords:
Main Article Content
Abstract
counterface of the persistent reduction of the project exercise to the significant plan of representation resources, an aspect that
is possible to recognize, symmetrically, in the particular way of exercising the typical postmodern theoretical reflexion. Thus, the
emptying of the ends of the project after the preoccupation for the means seems to coincide with the apparent critical radicality
of deconstructivist ironism that, having become today the common sense of the self-promotional writing of the “architect-
entrepreneur”, has not done anything but exercise a strong discursive depolitization of the discipline. Precisely, postmodern ironism
as an “ideology” needs to be thought of and fought against from a field that recognizes itself as resistant to its influence, at the time
of demanding, urgently, the repolitization of the project notion by means of a critique of ideologies. Only the public vocation of the
university would seem to have the necessary conditions for a new meaning of this nature, reclaiming the modernist inspiration of the
architectural project.
Article Details
Materia Arquitectura provides immediate and free access to all the content of this online edition, published simultaneously with the print edition.
Materia Arquitectura does not charge authors for any concept.
All contents of this electronic edition are distributed under the Creative Commons license of "Attribución-shareAlike 4.0 Internacional" (CC-BY-SA).
The rights of the published texts and images belong to their authors, who grant Materia Arquitectura the license for their use. The management of the permits and the authorization of the publication of the images (or of any material) that contains copyright and its consequent rights of reproduction in this publication is the sole responsibility of the authors of the articles.
As long as they mention their origin, the authors are free to distribute their articles by other means. Any total or partial reproduction of the material must mention its origin.
Downloads
References
EAGLETON, T. (1988). Una introducción a la teoría literaria. C. de México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
EISENMAN, P. (1994). El fin de lo clásico. En P. Hereu, J. M. Montaner & J. Oliveras, Textos de Arquitectura de la Modernidad (págs. 463-492). Madrid: Nerea.
KANT, I. (1993). Crítica del Juicio (Introducción IX De cómo la facultad de juzgar enlaza las legislaciones del entendimiento y de la razón). Buenos Aires: Losada.
LACLAU, E. (2002). Política de la retórica. En E. Laclau, Misticismo, retórica y política (págs. 57-99). Buenos Aires: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
LYOTARD, J.-F. (2000). La condición posmoderna. Informe sobre el saber. Madrid: Cátedra.
PUEBLA PONS, J. (2002). Neovanguardias y representación arquitectónica. La expresión innovadora del proyecto contemporáneo. Barcelona: UPC.
RORTY, R. (1989). Contingencia, ironía y solidaridad. Barcelona: Paidós.
SLOTERDIJK, P. (2007). Crítica de la razón cínica. Madrid: Siruela.ŽIŽEK, S. (2009). El sublime objeto de la ideología. Buenos Aires: Siglo Veintiuno.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- José Solís, Vicisitudes del proyecto. Ironismo privado y crítica de las ideologías , Materia Arquitectura: No. 08 (2013): Materia Arquitectura 08 (Diciembre/December 2013)