Sales Oddity: Milano 2 and the Politics of Direct-to-Home TV Urbanism

Contenido principal del artículo

Resumen

This article analyses the coordination of national television channels, architecture and urbanism in post-war Europe, and how, together, they promoted an increase of industrial production based on a homogenization of the working population. In this process, the joint action of the RAI, the city of Milan and Italy’s Istituto per la Ricostruzione Industriale represents a paradigm case. Milano 2, the main urban and social residential project developed by Edilnord, challenged the urban and social project of national television channels from 1968 onwards. With a population of ten thousand inhabitants concentrated in an urban isolated land a ten-minute drive from the centre of the capital of Lombardy, Milano 2 s main objective was to segregate the “Number Ones” – the sector of the population with the highest consumption capacity – in an environment where their shopping could be controlled by Edilnord. This model of urban development took place in transmedia layers and, as a case study, it allows detecting what the geographies on which architecture acquires relevance in the everyday construction of power are like.

Detalles del artículo



Andrés Jaque
Jaque, A. (2014). Sales Oddity: Milano 2 and the Politics of Direct-to-Home TV Urbanism. Materia Arquitectura, (10), 103–107. https://doi.org/10.56255/ma.v0i10.159

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

ARDIZZONI, M. (octubre, 2013). Tactical media practices in Italy: The case of Insu^tv. Journalism, 14(7), 868-884.

BALBI, G., & PRARIO, B. (mayo, 2010). The history of Fininvest/Mediaset’s media stratey: 30 years of politics, the market, technology and italian society. Media Culture Society, 32(3), 391-409.

CASABELLA. (enero, 1970). Casabella(344).

CERETTI, P., & FANTACCI, R. (2011). I nostri alberi. Una passeggiata botanica tra le Residenze ed i luoghi d’incontro di Milano 2. Segrate: Edilnord.

COLOMBO, F. (octubre/diciembre, 1990). Le tre stagioni. Problemi dell’Informazione(4), 593-597.

COLOMBO, F. & SORICE, M. (2010). “Audience Studies in Italy”. Cost Action IS0906 Transforming Audiences, Transforming Societies.

D’ANNA, S. E., & MONCALVO, G. (1994). Berlusconi in Concert. Londres: Otzium.

EDILNORD CENTRI RESIDENZIALI S.A.S. (1976). Milano 2. Una cità per vivere. Milán: Edilnord Centri Residenziali.

FOOT, J. (2001). Milan Since the Miracle. City, Culture and Identity. Nueva York: Berg.

GINSBORG, P. (2004). Silvio Berlusconi: Television, Power and Patrimony. Londres: Verso.

HEMINGWAY, J. L. (1999). Leisure, Social Capital, and Democratic Citizenship. Journal of Leisure Research, 31(2), 150-165.

IYENGAR, S., PETERS, M. D., & KINDER, D. R. (diciembre, 1982). Experimental Demonstrations of the “Not-So-Minimal”, Consequences of Television New Programs. The American Political Science Review, 76(4), 848-858.

MOLITERNO, G. (Ed.). (2000). Encyclopedia of Contemporary Italian Culture. Londres: Routledge.

PADOVANI, C. (noviembre, 2012). Berlusconi on Berlusconi? An analysis of digital terrestrial television coverage on commercial broadcast news in Italy. Discourse & Communication, 6(4), 423-447.

RAI, M., & COTTLE, S. (abril, 2007). Global mediations: On the changing ecology of satellite television news. Global Media and Communication, 3(1), 51-78.

SACCOMANO, E. (1994). Berlusconi: le dossier vérité. París: Parole Et Silence.

STILLE, A. (2007). The Sack of Rome. Media + Money + Celebrity = Power = Silvio Berlusconi. Nueva York: Penguin Books.

VISCONTI, D. (2011). 1971-2011. I quarant’anni di Milano 2. Segrate: Edilnord.